Sounds like GRSec is the solution then, especially since it seems to integrate into an existing environment far better than the alternative.
Do you know of any Debian-specific documentation or configuration notes for your GRSec, so I can read up on the steps necessary or any parameters that need to be configured, etc.? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:33 PM Subject: Re: LSM or GRSecurity > On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:59, Jason Lim wrote: > > So long answer short... go with GRSec, because Russell says so *j/k* > > > > So what would really need to be changed/modified to run GRSec on a Debian > > system running testing distro? Not too much I hope.... > > Maybe 2 or 3 sysctl entries, depending on what grsec options you choose. If > you build your kernel in a way that matches your environment then you just > need to install the new kernel. > > It's easy. > > -- > Signatures >4 lines are rude. If you send email to me or to a mailing list > that I am subscribed to which has >4 lines of legalistic junk at the end > then you are specifically authorizing me to do whatever I wish with the > message (the sig won't be read). > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
