On Wed, 1 Aug 2001 08:31, Roger Abrahamsson wrote:
> > LVM is the correct solution to this problem. You can run LVM over
> > multiple RAID-5 and RAID-1 arrays. Then you have RAID for reliability
> > and LVM to allow easy growth of storage.
> >
> > I'm still not sure that LVM is ready for serious use though...
>
> Hmm, LVM could solve it in a fashion.. However I would have to build one
> new raid5 array each time I uppgraded it with that solution. It would have
> been nice to be able to grow it with one disk at a time. I just thought it
> would be possible to do it, since it's all done in software in any
> case. As for serious use, this is still an "el cheapo" solution. It's okay
> for some downtime, as long as the data stays intact.
The way RAID-5 works with 3 disks is to put blocks in the following order (X
is an XOR parity block):
0 1 X
X 2 3
4 X 5
6 7 X
...
With 4 disks it will be the following:
0 1 2 X
X 3 4 5
6 X 7 8
...
So adding an extra disk would involve moving every block of data (apart from
the first two). Now what happens if you experience a crash or power failure
while doing such a re-build?
--
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
