I said that IPSec was probably the "best" way because it's
a standard protocol, with companies such as Microsoft and
Cisco supporting it and it's supposed to be built into IPv6
if/when we ever see that.
As for how it compares, I have no idea. FreeS/WAN is the
only implementation of IPSec I've used so I won't try to
say that it's better or worse than any other implementation.
j.
--
Jeremy L. Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 3:17 AM
To: Jeremy Gaddis
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (a VPN)
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 11:25:24AM -0500,
Jeremy Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 42 lines which said:
> Using an IPSec VPN is probably the "best" way to do it.
Why? (This is a real question: I see *many* solutions but I wonder why
I would choose one above the others.)
> FreeS/WAN (http://www.freeswan.org) is a Linux implementation
> of IPSec, but it's not the easiest thing in the world to
How do you compare it to other IPsec implementations such as pipsecd?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
