Hi, Am 2. Januar 2024 17:39:10 MEZ schrieb Thomas Lange <la...@cs.uni-koeln.de>: >Hi all, > >on the po pages like https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po/af >we have a long listing of the languages at the top with their >abbreviation (like aa de fr) but we also have a link to the language >list at the top, which is the same list but with the names of the >languages. IMO it sufficient to keep the link to the "Language list" >and we can remove the long liststing of the languages on the po pages.
Yes, exactly the same came to my mind yesterday. +1 >The same applies to a listing on the bottom of the page called "Packages >already i18n-ed" >This long listing is not needed because we have a link at the top to >"POT files" which includes the same information in a different format. > >Do I miss any useful usage of those long lists? >If we remove those listings, the po pages will provide the same >information but in a cleaner appearance. The "Packages already i18n-ed" list irritates me: there are many packages in that listing, but the package name is not a link to the pot file, as it is the case for the others. And those packages are missing in the "POT files" page. So I don't know which list is the better one or how they work or belong together... >BTW, I think the same applies for po4a and po-debconf. Correct. Holger -- Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
