On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 08:15:08 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Camaleón (noelamac+gm...@gmail.com): > >> The "sudo" usage is new to me... I mean, this is the first time I see >> it in a string for a command. Is this okay? I think we -at Debian- do >> not enable "sudo" by default :-? > > > Indeed. Some Ubuntuism leaked here, apparently..:-). But I guess any > Debian user is certainly able to guess what's meant here. Not sure that > I really want to go into changing everything for this...:-)
Okay, no problem then; I was just curious because it was the first PO file I found using "sudo". Anyway, in the same file there are other "command-to-run" sentences where "sudo" is not used, for instance: #. Type: boolean #. Description #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../templates:7001 ../templates:8001 msgid "" "If activated, the APT post-invoke hook takes care of future automatic " "upgrades of guest package(s) on host package upgrade. When an update is " "available, the hook will attempt to download and build the package(s), and " "(if \"apt-get check\" reports no errors) install them with \"dpkg -i\"." msgstr "" #. Type: boolean #. Description #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../templates:7001 ../templates:8001 msgid "" "Alternatively, guest packages can be built by manual invocation of \"dpkg-" "reconfigure ${PKGI}\"." msgstr "" Maybe it's also okay to mix both. I really think the average "root" and "sudo" user will understand what needs to be run in every case. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-i18n-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2013.11.30.14.15...@gmail.com