Quoting Michael Bramer (m.bra...@deb-support.de):
> Sorry, christian, this count for me... Well, sorry, but it doesn't, for me. I haven't seen an explanation about why *anonymous* contributions have improved the status for Danish. And I haven't seen any explanation about why they have to be anonymous. What Joe told is that: - the status of Danish improved during recent months - 22 reviews are waiting for some time What I would like to hear, at least to be able to *understand* is why activating anonymous contributions makes this any better. ============================================================ Is there someone cooperating on a regular basis who is using the anonymous way to contribute? Are there reasons for this person to insist on using anonymous contributions or is it just because (s)he doesn't know about anon-anonymous mode? ============================================================ *All this* is what I want to hear. And I insist on that. I will not revert the change made to allow anon for Danish, but I will like to get answers to my questions and I insist strongly on such discussion to happen before re-activating other anon contribs. I also insist strongly on having input from the German team about the status of their anonymous contributor(s). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-i18n-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110812073955.gk21...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org
