Martin Eberhard Schauer wrote: > Shouldn't 608900 be reassigned to debian-i18n and closed as the > description is fixed now? To be precise: closed means marked as done.
I closed it when the change hit the mirrors (I only marked it "pending" when it was fixed in DDTSS/DDTP because I've learned to be skeptical of the relevant infrastructure in the past). > As far as I understand the process of translating package descriptions, > the maintainer is somehow "less responsible" for what's happening out > there in DDTSS/DDTP as description translations are not part of his package. Ah, I hadn't known about the debian-i18n package! Thanks for a pointer. Since the bug is already closed, I'm leaving it alone. :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-i18n-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110503184255.GA1019@elie
