Quoting Michal Simunek (michal.simu...@gmail.com): > #. Type: boolean > #. Description > #. Type: boolean > #. Description > #: ../openvas-plugins-dfsg.templates:1001 > #: ../openvas-plugins-dfsg.templates:2001 > msgid "" > "The package can remove it now or you can select to remove it later on " > "manually." > > Further to boolean type, I thing better is: > > "The package installation can remove it now or you can remove it later " > "manually." > > Because you can select Yes or No, not Remove it now or Remove it later > manually.
While improving debconf templates is always welcomed, I'm very reluctant to do this at the moment I'm proposing a simple NMU to deal with pending translation work. The formal review process is another process (that takes quite a long time) and mixing it with the simple NMu process is likely to lead to bad results. I'd suggest sending a but report with patch (against the original templates, preferrably) including a mention that a translation update round is needed if the templates change happens.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
