At Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:27:56 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > Would that be feasible? The advantage over your proposal is that unused > > locales would be removed right after udeb installation (they would > > still be provided by the udeb though), reducing memory footprint for > > the RAM disk. It would require additional logic in udpkg (or anna), > > however.
> It would also require a change to localechooser as the installer should > not offer to change language after the deletion of translations has taken > place. > > I would not like to see this done for all installations: why handicap the > installer if a system has plenty of memory? > I can see this as a possible change for lowmem level 1: instead of falling > back to only English, offer language selection and then display a dialog > that all other languages will be disabled. It should mean an almost > negligible change in the lowmem levels (one translation fits in ~0.5MB). This (improving lowmem) is exactly what I said at Extremadura meeting :) One minor problem is "if user back to main menu and choose another language, what can we do?" as eddyp mentioned about other topic at the meeting. Thanks, -- Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]