Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On 8/22/06, Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think you misunderstood the question. It's possible that a review >> process starts from the beginning, because the previous proofreader >> just changed the line breaks but did no changes to content. >> >> IIRC this results currently in no diff but requires a new review cycle. > > Ah, so you mean a change that wasn't really a significant change. > Yeah, changes in line-breaks cause confusing diffs. I've pondered > deciding what's an "insignificant change" and in that case doing the > diff from the old version still.
> > I'm thinking insignificant would "only changes to whitespace and > capitalisation", or can you think or something better? I mean that there are no changes, nothing, except that the proofreader pressed «accept with changes» instead «accept as is».. In that case, a new review cycle is needed? Sorry, i should had explain better the problem.. > > Have a nice day, you too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
