On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 07:14:41PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 06:18:52PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 12:32:12PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote: > > > Hello all > > [...] > > > No I write some requirements in the attachement. Maybe you have time > > > and send some comments or add some new points. > > > > > > After this discussion I will send this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maybe they > > > find a technical solution for ours requirements... > > > > please put your proposition somewhere on the Net, so that you can refer to > > it. > > Your positions during previous discussions were evolving, so it was > > sometimes > > hard to understand what you were talking about. Because of that some people > > made wrong assumptions you had to fight against. > > Having a place where you put (and update) what you have in mind will help > > to focus on solving problems instead of flaming. > > I don't see any flaming now.
Yes, and that's good. But before any flame appear, please put the proposal online. Last time we've made a proposal, it was hard to follow what we were proposing since it's a moving target, and it resulted in a useless flamewar. To avoid it this time, it would be *really* good to put a up-to-date document somewhere... Even if the choice of this or this library will be done by dpkg maintainers, it is a good thing that we discuss here of the advantages and disadvantages of each solution, IMHO. Thanks for your work, Mt. -- Un clavier azerty en vaut deux.
