Hi, Quoting Samuel Thibault (2024-04-10 10:46:14) > Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues, le mer. 10 avril 2024 10:09:02 +0200, a > ecrit: > > So I tried the whole thing again and we got a new blocker: > > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=fakeroot > > I'm not sure why it's a blocker? Is the previous fakeroot version not > enough?
if you want to co-install Multi-Arch:same packages, then they all need to have the same version. > > Do you see an easy way to fix fakeroot on hurd-i386 > If it was easy it would be fixed already :) > > > or should I just disable fakeroot mode? > Note that there is the fakeroot-hurd alternative which is actually much more > lightweight and much less hacky than fakeroot. I think for now I'll just disable running the tests in fakeroot for hurd. It's not that important to have that working anyway. > > Or maybe I should switch my tests from hurd-i386 to hurd-amd64? > You'll probably miss a lot of packages on hurd-amd64. Okay, then I'll stay with hurd-i386 for now. The next thing I have to investigate is pam: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029097 It seems that new versions of login, passwd and util-linux require a more recent version of pam than was last buildable: The following packages have unmet dependencies: login : PreDepends: libpam-runtime but it is not going to be installed PreDepends: libpam-modules but it is not installable passwd : Depends: libpam0g (>= 0.99.7.1) but it is not installable Depends: libpam-modules but it is not installable util-linux : PreDepends: libpam0g (>= 0.99.7.1) but it is not installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. I'll see if I can apply the patches from #1029097 locally to work around this. Maybe this should be fixed upstream instead but I don't find a mention of hurd in https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues Thanks! cheers, josch
signature.asc
Description: signature
