Helmut Grohne, le ven. 19 juin 2020 20:56:23 +0200, a ecrit: > Thank you for working on this. When you talk about cross toolchains, > please Cc debian-cr...@lists.debian.org. Doing so now.
Ok, I wasn't sure since that was more a bootstrap concern. > In principle yes. Since the target architecture is part of the package > name and encoded in command names, we consider it not affecting the > interface. Yes, whatever the host arch, the result will be the same for the given target. > There is one major exception. Some tools (such as binutils) allow > loading of plugins (shared objects). I'm not aware of any such system in > mig, We don't have this indeed. I'll fix that then. > > I guess it's the reboostrap automatic build that does not support > > merging with previous builds for another architecture? > > Yes. This is a limitation of rebootstrap. It really is a hacky script > that barely gets stuff built, but is relatively stupid otherwise. Ok :) > However, I think that this is irrelevant due to another issue. Actually, in practice ATM, mig-i686-gnu:amd64 remains installed from its amd64 build, and fills the dep of mig-for-host:hurd-i386, and thus it's not a problem that it is not actually available from the repo any more. Samuel
