Hi, (purely optional mail follows)
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:21:41AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:25:45PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 01:13 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > From what you've explained, this bug should be reassigned to APT then ? > > It has been filed on apt and never been assigned elsewhere. > And, David already fixed it in git, tagging the bug +pending. > He responded[1] only to 826043-submitter (ie, me and the bug docket) > without CC:ing debian-hurd@l.d.o. Which I'm hereby doing. [Not sure I would have included d-hurd@ even if I had manually replied (but I thought buglog & commit message [1] will be enough text already and hadn't really anything to add) mainly as this isn't really hurd specific, just easier to 'see' as a problem as on hurd it actually fails while on linux it 'just' generates a warning which is hidden in the 'apt update' case, but manual usage of apt-key should have made them visible (sometimes at least). That also means I haven't actually tested it on hurd, so if anyone wants to… testers are always welcome!] btw: I just checked: I introduced the first of the two finds (which is the more obvious problem as that codepath is used more) on 7 Jul 2015 (25f27319) [the other is 6 Dec 2015], so that problem isn't recent but lingers there since 1.1 and I have to wonder if something changed in regards to this on hurd (or d-i) or if that really is some huge Baader-Meinhof bias… [2] (and I am bit surprised we had nobody on non-hurd complain about 'strange' messages being emitted while using apt-key – but perhaps that just means nobody is using apt-key anymore… if only that were true…) Best regards David Kalnischkies [1] The mail isn't even sent by me via a tool, but by a git hook: https://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/Git#Marking_closed_bugs_as_pending_in_BTS [2] I have these "how on earth could we miss that for so long?!?" moments quite often recently… which is another instance itself…
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
