> Roland McGrath, le Wed 18 Feb 2015 16:40:06 -0800, a ?crit : > > The short answer is that it's pretty well hopeless. > > Ok, that's what I was feeling, thanks for the confirmation :)
Note this also means that features like dynamic linker namespaces and audit modules are essentially unusable on the Hurd. That is unfortunate (while the fact that static linking usage that was already ill-advised is wholly untenable does not actually bother me at all). But changing this would require a major overhaul and redesign of the entire client-side implementation of the Hurd. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150219005557.d29bf2c3...@topped-with-meat.com