Svante Signell, le Wed 22 Oct 2014 11:33:39 +0200, a écrit : > On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 11:11 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > On 2014-10-22 10:59, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > > > > Updated patch attached. For the first part of the patch, I don't find > > > using g_strdup_printf() is an advantage over g_malloc(), since later > > > on > > > g_realloc() is needed. > > > > The other option is to just use a different buffer for each path, which > > could actually simplify the code (you are also not checking whether a > > new length is smaller than the previous one, to avoid realloc). > > Yes, that could be a solution too, Samuel?
What looks nicer is usually what maintainers prefer. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
