Steven Chamberlain, le Mon 06 May 2013 21:20:57 +0100, a écrit : > On 06/05/13 20:27, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > Adding it and then keeping it out of the usual migration rules is asking > > for failure from the beginning, accumulating cruft. Not a way to go, IMO. > > In that case would there be 150-200 RC-severity bugs introduced right > away by its inclusion?
I would rather say simply dropping them, as already requested in Bug#704477. And as I said a fair amount of these are actually already submitted as general FTBFS bugs or "upgrade libtool" bugs. > There is a lot of overlap though, e.g. fixing a kfreebsd build failure > may fix hurd-i386. Yes, there are a lot of these. Funniest cases are for instance "that's not linux? Oh, that must be windows, let's include windows.h"... Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130506203545.ga11...@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr
