Hi again,
Here is another patch that I could use some help with. I was essentially
trying to cheat by just
using the posix files. It does allow the package to build, however it fails
the test suites because
_EXTRA_ALL isn't defined.
I was going to copy the _pslinux and _psutil_linux files to something like
_psgnu and _psutil_gnu.
However, the linux code relies a lot on /proc and uses /proc/cpuinfo which we
don't have.
The other option would be to try to use the _psbsd and _psutil_bsd files.
I am open to suggestions or help..
Thanks!
Barry deFreese
Index: python-psutil-0.4.1/setup.py
===================================================================
--- python-psutil-0.4.1.orig/setup.py 2012-06-10 10:24:51.000000000 +0000
+++ python-psutil-0.4.1/setup.py 2012-06-10 10:35:34.000000000 +0000
@@ -72,6 +72,12 @@
sources=['psutil/_psutil_linux.c'],
),
posix_extension]
+# GNU
+elif sys.platform.lower().startswith("gnu"):
+ extensions = [Extension('_psutil_posix',
+ sources=['psutil/_psutil_posix.c'],
+ ),
+ posix_extension]
else:
raise NotImplementedError('platform %s is not supported' % sys.platform)
Index: python-psutil-0.4.1/psutil/__init__.py
===================================================================
--- python-psutil-0.4.1.orig/psutil/__init__.py 2012-06-10 10:24:51.000000000
+0000
+++ python-psutil-0.4.1/psutil/__init__.py 2012-06-10 10:36:46.000000000
+0000
@@ -79,6 +79,9 @@
elif sys.platform.lower().startswith("freebsd"):
import psutil._psbsd as _psplatform
+elif sys.platform.lower().startswith("gnu"):
+ import psutil._psposix as _psplatform
+
else:
raise NotImplementedError('platform %s is not supported' % sys.platform)
