Hi, On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:18:30PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On 28/05/12 01:52, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > On 29/05/12 19:57, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > [...] we add hurd-i386 to testing with > > > break/fucked, but we don't expect it to make the release. I.e. bugs > > > for hurd-i386 are not RC. > > > > Maybe that's all that's needed? > > > > The recent enthusiasm sounds to me like an opportunity. An official > > testing suite in the archive, from which usable installer images can be > > built, could be what encourages hurd-i386 to progress into something > > really releasable. If this doesn't happen now while there's some > > momentum, it might never happen again and that would be a shame. > > >From the one of the porters side, this would be a _very_ good solution > indeed! If GNU/Hurd enters som kind of testing status, the number of > users and contributors will increase (hopefully). Can it be part of > testing and then when the release happens, be treated specially?
As I understand it, this has been discussed but deemed not possible/worthwhile. > And most packages will be located in the main repo, only the packages > having patches, not yet handled by the DMs, being there. Is that > possible? What do you mean with "there"? Either there is a testing distribution, or there is not, as far as Debian is concerned. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120601235418.gr10...@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org
