Joerg Jaspert, le Tue 29 May 2012 09:02:32 +0200, a écrit : > There is only one thing I would agree on: If the RT decides to not > include them in wheezy but add them to wheezy+1 right after wheezy is > released (so we would be doing it during the process) and keep them > there for the next release, then fine. Thats not exactly what we agreed > on, but would be a workable compromise.
I believe that'd be fine from the Hurd part. I personnally don't want to add work on people by hurrying hurd-i386 into wheezy. > - hurd is no longer on the main mirrors. But "only" on those carrying > debian-ports. I don't think it's a problem indeed. What is a problem is not appearing on buildd.debian.org. That makes maintainers way less receptive to patches or even fix their package themselves. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120530100121.gr3...@type.bordeaux.inria.fr
