Alle martedì 17 aprile 2012, Svante Signell ha scritto: > BTW: Doesn't the CString resultString; need to be initialized? > Or something like: > if (result >= 0 && result < sb.st_size) > resultString = CString(readLinkBuffer, result); > else > resultString = CString();
The else branch is not needed, resultString is already initialized.
> Of course the definition of resultString could be placed before first
> statement, but it looks like in C++ people mix freely?
C++ (just like C99, FWIW) allows to declare variables inside code
blocks, and not strictly at the start of a block.
> + if (readLinkBuffer == NULL)
> + return CString();
The return needs 4 spaces of indentation, like the rest of the code.
Now that I saw webkit's code, I'm a bit dubious about the code in
Source/JavaScriptCore/wtf/gobject/GlibUtilities.cpp; it basically does
something like this (simplified for convenience of email):
| #if OS(LINUX)
| CString getCurrentExecutablePath()
| { /* read path from /proc/self/exe */ }
| #elif OS(UNIX)
| CString getCurrentExecutablePath()
| { /* read path from /proc/curproc/file */ }
| #elif OS(WINDOWS)
| CString getCurrentExecutablePath()
| { /* read path using Windows API */ }
| #endif
Your patch would make use of /proc/curproc/file, which would seem to be
part of the FreeBSD procfs[1]; our procfs is more oriented to emulate
Linux's one, so IMHO we should either use the Linux code, or add an
empty getCurrentExecutablePath() like this:
| #elif OS(HURD)
| CString getCurrentExecutablePath()
| { return CString(); }
[1] http://www.unix.com/man-page/FreeBSD/5/procfs/
--
Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
