On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:07:12PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > I compiled emacs cvs with the glibc that emacs21 (the Debian package) > uses, and it works just dandy; where as if I even recompiled emacs21 > it would segfault. So I don't think it is a glibc problem.
Thanks for pointing that out. I found an experimental emacs22 source package on the web (at http://hanzubon.org/Linux/Debian/HANZUBON/experimental/source ) and rebuilt in on hurd-i386. The packages are here: http://people.debian.org/~mbanck/hurd/emacs22_22+0+20050320cvs-0hanzubon1_hurd-i386.deb http://people.debian.org/~mbanck/hurd/emacs22-nox_22+0+20050320cvs-0hanzubon1_hurd-i386.deb http://people.debian.org/~mbanck/hurd/emacs22-el_22+0+20050320cvs-0hanzubon1_all.deb http://people.debian.org/~mbanck/hurd/emacs22-common_22+0+20050320cvs-0hanzubon1_all.deb http://people.debian.org/~mbanck/hurd/emacs22-bin-common_22+0+20050320cvs-0hanzubon1_hurd-i386.deb or simply 'deb http://people.debian.org/~mbanck/hurd/ ./' I audited both the Debian diff and the original tarball, the latter is identical to Emacs CVS from March, 20th. I briefly tested the emacs22-nox package on two boxen and it worked fine. However, I'd welcome more feedback. I need to fix the Build-Depends slightly and will then upload the packages to gnuab, if nobody objects. enjoy, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
