[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neal H. Walfield) writes: > > > Why do I feel like repeating this old mantra: Bad security is worse > > > than no security. > > > > Sez you. Many disagree. Especially for a system in development, with > > already has bad security. > > I think that we can all accept that there are currently a variety of > security holes in the Hurd. The type of security holes which would be > introduced by using bad random data, however, is far worse as it has > the potential to allow an attacker to obtain access to systems that > are ssh'ed to from the Hurd.
Really? So you think that using telnet to get to those systems will be more secure?
