Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My point was that if we can reasonably show that on a GNU/Hurd system > that most (say 90-95%?) of the commands in sbin would be reasonable for > a power user to use there is probably value in just having that in the > general users path.
You seem to be assuming that the Hurd developers in general think there should be no /sbin, and that we should all work together to find a way to get rid of it. In fact, we disagree about this issue, which is not really a Hurd-specific issue anyway.
