> I didn't say it was difficult. It's easy. It's also silly. Why > should I worry all the time about such adaptation? > > How many languages do you want me to support? > > C++ is an *incompatible* extension of C. Extension yes, compatible, > no.
Just a weeks ago, you were arguing on one of the glibc lists that the strl* functions should be included in glibc because it is (1) easy and (2) it makes glibc/applications more portable/easily ported. What is the difference between these two arguments?
