To whom it may concern (mainly Jeff): This might bite us when we have a flag day and do binary only recompile uploads. We have to isolate the cases where there is an exact version dependency and treat them seperately.
Marcus ----- Forwarded message from Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: what is libc6 2.2.4-6.0.1 in ppc? From: Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Dispatcher: imput version 991025(IM133) Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-From: [email protected] X-Mailing-List: <[email protected]> archive/latest/102385 Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recently when I was upgrading sid system (ppc), dpkg complained that locales 2.2.4-6 depended on glibc 2.2.4-6 but there was no such file. In fact there is only libc6 2.2.4-6.0.1 now. What is this libc6 2.2.4-6.0.1 and why there is no associating locales? If this is already known problem, I'm very sorry. Best regards, 2001.12.5 -- Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Department of Math., Tokushima Univ. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- End forwarded message -----
