On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 08:11:08PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > > That's an idea. Can you submit it as a bug report against libc0.2 (or > > whatever contains ldconfig now)? > > I've expanded the script a bit, so that "ldconfig -X" and the like > still silently succeeds, and put in a --help message discussing the > issues. Could you review it (in bug#95189), particularly the > explanation? I don't want to spread pseudoauthorative falsehoods.
It might be worth to elide the use of getopt. The getopt binary is in util-linux. This is only on alpha.gnu.org and not really ported and it is also not in the tar file. On the other hand, it might be worth to push porting util-linux, but it needs heavy changes to the Makefiles. It would be wise to coordinate this with the upstream maintainer. (Ideally, util-linux would cease to exist and all utilities spread among other GNU packages like textutils. Roland sent me a list for such a division. I can provide it to interested people). Otherwise, I like it very much. The text is fine. Thanks, Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de
