Hi! >>>>> Marcus Brinkmann writes:
MB> The 106-0.3 should be in the archive, or they were delayed or MB> rejected. Rejected... because the installers won't accept new binary packages without source (which is a good policy), and for a braino of mine in changing /usr/doc to /doc. MB> 109? Hey, I missed it! Gordon has done some work, it seems. For a change. ;) -- Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/) Lovers of freedom, unite! \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/) [Unfortunately, www.fig.org is broken. Please stay tuned for details.]
