On 21 November 2023 1:57:51 pm IST, Maytham Alsudany <maytha8the...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On Mon, 2023-11-20 at 20:23 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>> However, the major issue here is that there is no license on that repo
>> and that is a ground for reject.
>
>I'm assuming it's under the same license as humanlog itself (since it's a
>component of humanlog), and that is Apache-2.0. Should I clarify upstream?
Since the repo at humanlogio/api does not have a license file or even mention
one anywhere, this absolutely needs to be clarified.
Thanks for all other changes. I'll take a look at them once the license thing
is fixed up and humanlog is ready for upload.
Best,
Nilesh
