Daniel Swarbrick <dswarbr...@debian.org> 于 2022年9月13日周二 08:26写道：
> On 12.09.22 22:41, Martina Ferrari wrote: > > > On 10/09/2022 16:13, Nilesh Patra wrote: > >> src:nomad still B-D on consul, although you are right that it is out > >> of testing, but > >> IIRC it was in a good shape a while ago(but not now), even made it to > >> last stable. > >> So keeping consul _maybe_ useful (dunno for sure) > >> > >> Also, src:patroni package (still in testing) has a "test-dep" in > >> d/tests/control on > >> consul, so that'd need to be dropped if you plan to remove it. > > > > Honestly, I don't have much time or motivation to work on consul. > > Unless somebody with an interest on it steps up and works on closing > > the RC bugs, it will end being removed from testing very soon.. > > Following the trail of broken builds back to the origin, it seems that > it all steps from not being able to build boltdb on riscv64. Upstream, > boltdb was forked (now lives at https://github.com/etcd-io/bbolt), and > this would involve package renaming and import path changes. > > However, looking at the changelogs for bbolt, I suspect that we could > make the existing boltdb package support riscv64 simply by > cherry-picking this as a patch for now: > https://github.com/etcd-io/bbolt/pull/159/files > > That should then unblock bug #1004303 and ultimately allow consul to > build on riscv64 (bug #1010306). > Why you think this thread is about the FTBFS on riscv64? It won't render consul rc-buggy. Consul is to be removed because no one takes time to maintain it and it has open security bug for a long time. >
