Hi, The current salsa-CI setting is designed in a way that it checks that onupdating a package a reverse dep is not breaking (as things work this way in the go world) -- great.
However, it still lacks the intensive testing that usual salsa_CI config has (build + i386build + lintian + reprotest + arch:any build + arch:all .. so on) due to understandeable reasons for now (not much resources IIRC?) However I think the current config is not useful for packages that users will directly use as programs, and which do not have an arch:all lib package. For example: aerc, micro, riseup-vpn, go-sendxmpp et. al. and I would much rather like to use the default salsa-ci config pipeline for these and I have changed it for a couple of them already. What do you think? And is there an objection in general? -- Regards, Nilesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
