Aloïs Micard <creekor...@debian.org>, 18/10/2021 – 18:33:14 (+0200):
> Since we try to keep only one version of a package at a given time, > every package upload may break other packages that depends on it. This > is especially true for Go core package. > > While we could use a standards workflow and use tools like > dose-ceve(1) to fetch reverse depends of a Go package and rebuild > everything in a clean schroot to make sure nothing has been broke with > the update, it is much more faster to keep a local index of all Go > packages and rebuild the whole Go archive and check for breakage. > That's why we have such a 'special' setup. Because it allows us to do > efficient rebuild (<30sec to rebuild the whole Go archive with an > up-to-date cache). We sacrifice the easier common setup for > performance. Thanks for the detailed explanation! As said earlier, I believe that a (very) fast CI is key and justify spending time on engineering it well. -- Faustin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
