[I've added Martín to CC, sorry if you're subscribed to the list.]
Am 19.01.2019 um 10:33 schrieb Arnaud Rebillout: > > On 1/18/19 11:42 PM, Tianon Gravi wrote: >> Have you tried using ratt to test the reverse dependencies? (That >> should give you a little better confidence in whether/what it might >> break to upload.) > > > Well, I just tried to fire ratt on the *current* version of > google-grpc-dev, the version that is already in debian unstable, ie. > 1.11.0-1. > > It triggers a rebuild of 114 packages. Quite heavy for my laptop. > > I stopped after 58 packages: 11 failed to build... So I don't think ratt > will help me in this case, fixing all the packages that already don't > build will be too much work. And if I don't fix them, I will have to > compare all the build failures against google-grpc-dev 1.11 and > google-grpc-dev 1.15, and try to guess which of these failures are due > to the 1.15 version?? Hmmm. I don't think it will work. > > I will try to patch docker to build against google-grpc-dev 1.11 > instead. Hopefully I will get to a result quick. Hi, wouldn't it be better to upload a more recent google-grpc-dev package to unstable? After all, it's not unlikely that those build failures are due to the old version of google-grpc-dev and would be fixed by an upload as well. Martín, you've already done the work of updating google-grpc-dev to release 1.15 in the salsa git repository, and it builds just fine in unstable -- is there any reason not to upload it? Regards, Tobias
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
