On Thursday, 27 September 2018 9:24:40 PM AEST Martín Ferrari wrote: > Dmitry, we had this discussion a long time ago in the team list and in > person during DebConf17
I wasn't part of this discussion (probably being busy working) or I would
have opposed it as hard as I could. No DEP-14 please.
> and decided to adopt this as policy.
What?!? We have to stop this madness. IMHO it is a disservice to team to
introduce DEP-14 and a standard practice.
> I really don't understand why you are so opposed to it,
Because it is a bad idea, inconvenient and time consuming.
It improves nothing and makes it mode difficult to maintain packages.
Now I have to put on hold everything that have to do and write about it just
to prevent it from happening... Why can't we work towards something useful?
I'll see if I can put some ideas together in the next few days.
I'm very very busy right now...
> maybe me or somebody else can work with you to ease that feeling?
Don't make it sound like my physiological problem. It is not about feelings.
Although I do feel betrayed because someone works behind my back to sabotage
what works in practice and replace it with inferior time consuming workflow.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Smirnov.
---
We do our friends no favors by pretending not to notice flaws in their
work, especially when those who are not their friends are bound to notice
these same flaws.
-- Sam Harris
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
