Hi, On 2024-12-30 21:32, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello Aurelien, > > the problem described by Christoph happens for me, too. > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 06:28:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On 2024-12-12 00:19, Christoph Egger wrote: > > > Package: tzdata > > > Version: 2024a-0+deb12u1 > > > Severity: important > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > tzdata update fails here, installing 2024a from /var/cache/apt gets the > > > system back to working. This is from inside a systemd-nspawn. > > > > > > Thank you > > > > > > Chistoph > > > > > > > > > (Reading database ... 65470 files and directories currently installed.) > > > Preparing to unpack .../tzdata_2024b-0+deb11u1_all.deb ... > > > Unpacking tzdata (2024b-0+deb11u1) over (2024a-0+deb12u1) ... > > > dpkg: error processing archive > > > /var/cache/apt/archives/tzdata_2024b-0+deb11u1_all.deb (--unpack): > > > unable to open '/usr/share/zoneinfo/posix/Africa/Abidjan.dpkg-new': No > > > such file or directory > > > Errors were encountered while processing: > > > /var/cache/apt/archives/tzdata_2024b-0+deb11u1_all.deb > > > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) > > > > Do I understand correctly that you try to downgrade tzdata from the > > bookworm version to the bullseye version? > > Well, yes and no. It tries to install the bullseye version over the one > from bookworm, but it's not a downgrade because 2024b-0+deb11u1 > > 2024a-0+deb12u1. > > $ apt policy tzdata > tzdata: > Installed: 2024a-0+deb12u1 > Candidate: 2024b-0+deb11u1 > Version table: > 2024b-0+deb11u1 500 > 500 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security/main > armhf Packages > *** 2024a-0+deb12u1 500 > 500 https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm/main armhf Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 2024a-0+deb11u1 500 > 500 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye/main armhf Packages > 2021a-1+deb11u11 500 > 500 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates/main armhf Packages > > OK, you could argue I should have deleted the bullseye sources from my > apt configuration or at least have given bookworm a higher pin. But you > could also argue that bullseye-security shouldn't have a higer version > than bookworm(-security)
It seems that the issue is that your system is missing bookworm-updates. So this will be fixed with the next point release in a couple of weeks. This is due to the way the LTS team is doing updates, ie they all go to -security. > or that the upgrade from 2024a-0+X to 2024b-0+X > should just work. That would be difficult, the failure is due to the use of dir_to_symlink from dpkg-maintscript-helper. Regards Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
