* Aurelien Jarno: > I have not time to look at the issue right now, but it appears that the > issue already exists in version 2.40-3. Marking it as such in the BTS so > that it doesn't prevent migration of 2.40-4 to testing.
Yes, I can confern, the issue exists in 2.40-3 also. Can you give any hints on things to try to track this down? Cheers, -Hilko
