On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 07:13:28PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk:
>...
> For comparison, the original plan was to provide a macro, perhaps
> -D_TIME_BITS=32 and -D_TIME_BITS=64, to select at build time which ABI
> set is used (“dual ABI”).
To me this would sound like more trouble than a clear break,
similar to the mostly working dual OpenSSL 1.0 and 1.1 support
in stretch.
"Mostly working" as in Apache segfaulting depending on the load order of
its modules - it is really hard to get all special cases like plugins
sorted out correctly in such setups.
> Similar to the LFS support, with the
> additional property that binaries built in either mode should continue
> to work on kernels which predate support for the *_time64 system
> calls.
Debian does not support running on kernels older than the one in the
previous stable release.
E.g. Qt in Debian 9 unconditionally uses the getrandom syscall that is
not in kernel 3.16 in Debian 7.
>...
> > For i386 the last newly released 32bit-only hardware were some early
> > Intel Atoms 10 years ago, and when the AMD Geode goes out of production
> > soon there might be no hardware in production left.
> > There are still surprisingly many people using Debian on 32bit-only
> > hardware, but in 20 years this will have changed.
>
> You have thankfully edited out the Intel Quark. 8-)
>...
Support for the Intel Quark was dropped when the i386 baseline was
raised from 586 to 686 in stretch, so that's already irrelevant for
the Debian i386 port.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
