On 2016-09-03 20:54, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> (2016-09-03): > > clone 836446 -1 > > reassign -1 debootstrap > > retitle -1 debootstrap: doesn't support arch-qualified dependencies > > affects -1 libc6-dev > > thanks > > Thanks for this. > > > On 2016-09-03 11:28, Sven Joachim wrote: > > > Package: libc6-dev > > > Version: 2.24-1 > > > Severity: important > > > > > > The fix for bug #834706 has the side effect that libc6-dev now depends > > > on linux-libc-dev:$arch : > > > > > > ,---- > > > | $ apt-cache show libc6-dev | grep ^Depends > > > | Depends: libc6 (= 2.24-1), libc-dev-bin (= 2.24-1), linux-libc-dev:i386 > > > (>= 4.6.4-1) > > > `---- > > > > > > While dpkg and apt obviously don't have a problem with that, debootstrap > > > cannot cope with it, and "debootstrap --variant=buildd" fails to even > > > download linux-libc-dev. See the attached log. > > > > That's definitely a bug in debootstrap. In the future it's more and more > > likely that we'll have arch-qualified dependencies in the bases packages, > > so this has to be fixed. I am therefore cloning and reassigning the bug. > > Do you plan to implement a workaround in glibc for now, or should this bug > report (on the debootstrap side) be raised to RC and fixed before we can > think of a new d-i release? (I have no such plan right now, but it might > be nice not to wait too much once linux has migrated).
I have just committed a workaround in glibc, I'll upload it in the next days. It would be nice to have this bug fixed for Stretch though, so that we can use arch-qualified dependencies in Buster. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
