On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2015-01-31 11:16, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >> That's what I thought, but I don't think the security update mentions that. >> Shouldn't it be mentioned somewhere? > > Maybe it should have been mentionned in the security advisory indeed. > >> IIRC some updates also offered to restart affected services >> semi-automatically, why was that not the case with this update? > > Because virtually everything is affected, how do you draw the line on > what has to be restarted or not?
I thought this was automated (based on dependencies) but if not, at least offer to automatically restart everything you can. -- Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caa7u3hmfs-ovdapkez2ngbh7nkxolgfp2tco0-vdfdpkwy8...@mail.gmail.com
