Hi,

On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 01:27:06PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Simon Paillard wrote:
> > Do you have a position regarding this ?
> [...]
> > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:48:51PM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> 
> >> If you agree with this, the next manpages{,dev} upload will replace 
> >> libc-bin
> >> with appropriate version, then you can drop them.
> 
> Please go ahead.  (I'm not an eglibc maintainer, but it seems so
> obviously the right thing to do that I don't mind saying that
> anyway.)

Thanks for your remark. Nevertheless, I'd like to get an ack from maintainers,
because I'd prefer a versionned replace. 
 
> If you'd like, I think it even makes sense to replace the ldconfig.8
> manpage, just taking the content from the eglibc package for now.
> That would avoid having to keep juggling which package has which
> manpage in the future.

It's my opinion too.

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130718200106.ge19...@mraw.org

Reply via email to