On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 04:20:27PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Roger Leigh, le Fri 03 Sep 2010 14:52:39 +0100, a écrit : > > On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 01:37:24AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > without any convergence. > > > > I think reading back through the entire log, > > Thanks for having done it! > > > people who were initially > > rather opposed to the proposal did come around once they appreciated > > exactly what the changes would be, and why they were needed. > > Ok. There was still a question of en_US.UTF-8 vs C.UTF-8, but I believe > the "en_US.UTF-8 is fine enough" argument doesn't hold any more since > some other people say that it isn't for them. > > > There were no objections to having a UTF-8 locale installed and > > available by default, just to it *being* the default. Taking this > > first small step is IMO important to do, preferably for squeeze if > > possible. Since it's a tiny one-liner change, this should be no > > trouble in getting this done. > > I believe so too, I just didn't want to push it too much, but yes, I > believe that's something that shouldn't break Squeeze at all. >
That's not something allowed anymore at this period of the freeze, you will have to get an exception from the release team first. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100903171640.gb26...@hall.aurel32.net
