On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:34:58PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:01:59PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Please don't reassign a bug to libc6 because you see the word libc6 in > > the backtrace. A double free is a bug in the package, not in glibc. > > > > To get a usable backtrace, just recompile the package with -O0: > > I didn't get any response to my last query, so reassignment was the logical
Sorry, but I have probably missed it. Given the ressource we have we are not able to treat all bugs, and even less to answer all mails. > recourse. But thanks for the attitude, really in tune with the Christmas > spirit :P Reassigning a bug without saying anything is also really annoying. And building the package with -O0 is the first thing you learn when debugging. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' aure...@debian.org | aurel...@aurel32.net `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
