On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:17:12PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > I guess this is a gdb issue then, since it doesn't seem to be able to > find symbols for libc. > > Hmmm, it can't even find the libc.so.6 symbols when I purge libc6-i686 > and copy /usr/lib/debug/lib/libc-2.7.so to /usr/lib/debug/lib/libc.so.6. > Same happens when I make a symlink to libc-2.7.so. Reinstalling > libc6-i686 and libc6-dbg doesn't seem to help either.
Sorry, there's no concrete information in this bug report. What exactly happens that you believe is a bug? I believe symbols for libc are deliberately not shipped, just enough to backtrace. So GDB is likely behaving as expected. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
