Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 03:12:16AM -0400, simon raven wrote:
>> Package: libc6 >> Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22 >> Severity: important >> >> downgraded glibc, since i was getting errors like: >> >> Aug 6 06:35:02 pylon CRON[306]: PAM unable to >> dlopen(/lib/security/pam_ldap.so) >> Aug 6 06:35:02 pylon CRON[306]: PAM [dlerror: /lib/libresolv.so.2: symbol >> __res_maybe_init, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so >> .6 with link time reference] >> >> and: >> >> Aug 6 06:35:03 pylon CRON[306]: PAM adding faulty module: >> /lib/security/pam_krb5.so >> Aug 6 06:35:03 pylon CRON[305]: PAM unable to >> dlopen(/lib/security/pam_krb5.so) >> Aug 6 06:35:03 pylon CRON[305]: PAM [dlerror: /lib/libresolv.so.2: symbol >> __res_maybe_init, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so >> .6 with link time reference] > These errors indicate bugs in those libraries (pam_ldap, pam_krb5). As the co-maintainer of pam_krb5.so, I'd love some more information here. I certainly do believe you, but nothing about that error message helps me figure out where the bug is in pam_krb5.so. It looks completely internal to the linkage between libresolv.so.2 and libc.so.6. Is there a standard cause of this bug or a standard thing that pam_krb5.so should be doing that it's not? This just showed up with the new glibc version. I'm also seeing: Aug 10 22:53:01 rivendell CRON[30864]: PAM [dlerror: /lib/libpthread.so.0: symbol __libc_stack_end, version GLIBC_2.1 not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference] with another PAM module, similar to another reported bug, but restarting the software doesn't help. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
