> >>Confirmed. We are passing a function pointer with a value of -2 into
> >>__cffc, which should not happen...
> > 
> > 
> > Is -2 a special signal number?
> 
> I don't think so. in any case, others have observed that if they use an 
> older glibc, this problem does not happen.

Not sure this is related, but your put_user kernel patch fixed
some c++ issues.  There are also issues with the alignment of
alternate signal stacks.

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin                                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
National Research Council of Canada              (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to