Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2005 17:42:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2004 11:26:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 04 04:26:00 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from muffin.area.ba.cnr.it [150.145.80.101]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CEQye-0007e7-00; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 04:26:00 -0700
Received: from klecker (klecker.ba.issia.cnr.it [150.145.84.32])
by muffin.area.ba.cnr.it (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id
i94BQ22Q016655;
Mon, 4 Oct 2004 13:26:02 +0200
Received: from frankie by klecker with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CEQyY-0000w1-Nm; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 13:25:54 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: /lib/libc.so.6 is not executable
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.99.5
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 13:25:54 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-16
Severity: normal
On other distros (e.g. RH) /lib/libc.so.6 is executable and returns
mainly libc version.
This is used in some scripts to check compatibilities and so breaks things.
For instance, it breaks Mathworks' Matlab internal scripts which uses
something like
ver=`/lib/libc.so.6 | head -1 | sed -e "s/^[^0-9]*//" -e "s/[ ,].*$//"`
to extract libc release.
If +x is added to libc.so.6, it fails as follows:
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1259: dl_main: \
Assertion `_rtld_local._dl_rtld_map.l_prev->l_next ==
_rtld_local._dl_rtld_map.l_next' failed!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 276384-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 May 2005 21:42:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 23 14:42:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nevyn.them.org [66.93.172.17] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DaKgq-0000T3-00; Mon, 23 May 2005 14:42:24 -0700
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DaKgp-0003c3-4l
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 May 2005 17:42:23 -0400
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 17:42:23 -0400
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This bug is now fixed in unstable, and hopefully will be fixed in sarge.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
