Your message dated Thu, 06 May 2004 00:58:47 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#218657: Still problems with df
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2003 23:34:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 01 17:34:04 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 216.184.11.30.unused.swcp.com (boa.b9.com) [216.184.11.30]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AG5Fs-0000Ly-00; Sat, 01 Nov 2003 17:34:04 -0600
Received: from tiger.med-info.com (tiger.med-info.com [216.184.11.129])
by boa.b9.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id hA1NY3QU012403
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Sat, 1 Nov 2003 16:34:03 -0700
Received: from tiger.med-info.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by tiger.med-info.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-4) with ESMTP id
hA1NY390028724;
Sat, 1 Nov 2003 16:34:03 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by tiger.med-info.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-4) id hA1NY379028722;
Sat, 1 Nov 2003 16:34:03 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Kevin M. Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: glibc: libc6 2.3.2.ds1-8 breaks system with x86_64 kernel
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 16:34:03 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: glibc
Severity: grave
Running with an x86_64 kernel, libc6 2.3.2.ds1-8 breaks most programs
including gcc and df.
Reverting back to 2.3.2-9 fixes the problem.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tiger 2.4.22 #1 Thu Oct 9 00:29:23 MDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 218657-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2004 15:58:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 05 08:58:49 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BLOnJ-0004Xr-00; Wed, 05 May 2004 08:58:49 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 583AFDEB58; Thu, 6 May 2004 00:58:47 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 00:58:47 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#218657: Still problems with df
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
At Mon, 3 May 2004 18:22:29 +0200,
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 05:13:28PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm forwarding this to debian-amd64 since I'm not working on debians
> > amd64 anymore since the DAM rejected me.
I expect you to be back to debian-amd64 effort :)
> I can't reproduce this on a system with libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11,
> coreutils 5.0.91-2 and a 2.6.5 kernel. Neither using 64bit or
> 32bit applications.
>
> I don't have an older kernel handy to test if this is a kernel
> bug or not.
OK... so I think it can be closed with the latest version. If you
reappear this problem with the latest version, please reopen this bug.
Regards,
-- gotom
