On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 10:37:48AM +0200, Niels M�ller wrote: > Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I don't know why you think there is a bug, but we don't plan to change the > > sockaddr format any time soon. sa_len is not a bug. > > Do you plan on changing the definition on GNU/Linux, then? To me, it > seems obvious that using different definitions of struct sockaddr on > linux and hurd will make it impossible to run a socket application > binary on the hurd, if it's compiled for GNU/Linux, and vice versa. > > Or have we dropped the plans for binary compatibility between > GNU/Linux and the hurd (when running on the same cpu)?
that's offtopic. i don't mind if you want to discuss wether we have the goal of binary compatibilty, but please don't CC the bug log in debian because it adds even more confusion to a bug that is actualy realy simple. -- Robert Millan make: *** No rule to make target `war'. Stop. Another world is possible - Just say no to genocide
