At Mon, 21 Apr 2003 16:22:58 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 12:06:47AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > >drawbacks. But from IST example, uniqueness of timezone name is not > >the absolute requirement. I guess your question is derived from > >"timezone should be unique", > > It would solve problems, and I have yet to hear a downside. The fact > that some timezones might not be unique doesn't seem a good argument > against fixing those that can be.
Hey, it's only your thought. You only insist to hear my downside point. And so? I leave these bugs alone. If you would like to modify this, please contact appropriate lists. If not, it's totally useless discussion. Regards, -- gotom
