> Since I did not modify any C code in this package at the time the bug > appeared, the problem must lie somewhere else. Running nbd-server in > strace shows that it accept()s the client's call, then fork()s, as it > should. Next, when the parent does a close() of the socket acquired with > accept(), a FIN packet is sent to the client, closing the connection, > although the child process still has the socket open. When it tries to > send() something through that socket, it of course gets a SIGPIPE. > > Attached, the two files that form the output of > > strace -ff -o nbd-server-trace nbd-server 1234 /export/m68k/exp-bl-dev
Why did you assign this bug to libc6 with grave severity? What is the problem? Which version was it worked? If I can not get valid information, I reassign this bug back to package nbd. -- gotom
